How America Funds Islamic Terrorism

                                                                                                  written 9 June 2019

                                                                                             published 16 June 2019

                                                                                                

            After WWI, France and England divided up the Arabian Peninsula, which had been controlled by the Ottoman Empire for several centuries. Neither country wanted to occupy any part of the region, but supported individual tribal leaders to act as their agents.  One of those chosen was Ibn Saud, who went on to defeat local rivals, consolidate territory, and form the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in 1932.  Eight years later, vast oil reserves were discovered in eastern reaches of the country.  These fields were brought into production by American oil companies a few years later as WWII began, generating enormous wealth for the Saud ruling family.

            Shortly after the prophet Muhammad died in 632, a dispute over succession split Islam into two denominations, Sunni and Shia. Both revere the Quran as the literal words of the prophet, but there are differences in the interpretation, which have led to violent conflict over time, much like the Catholic/Protestant division.  Approximately 85% of the world's Muslims are Sunni, but Shia are majority in Iran, Iraq, and Lebanon.  Saudi Arabia and Iran are the current leaders of their respective denominations, and the religious dispute is played out in their geopolitics.

            Two centuries ago, an ultra-conservative Sunni preacher formed Wahhabism, with very narrow, inflexible interpretations of Islam, and aligned himself with the Saud family for mutual political gain.  As the Saud family gained power and wealth, so did Wahhabism.  After WWII, oil revenues helped spread the message throughout the Islamic world using books, media, schools, universities and mosques.  Like other rigid religious fundamentalists, Wahhabism has no tolerance for other religious belief, and is particularly harsh with regard to Shia Islam, which it regards as heretical.  Within Saudi Arabia, Wahhabism controls the education, law, and public morality courts, in exchange for ignoring the flagrant disregard of these mores by the ruling family.  

            When American domestic oil production peaked in 1972, control of the price of oil shifted to Saudi Arabia. A year later came the first oil boycott against the US for supporting Israel during the Yom Kippur war, which quadrupled the price of oil.  To get oil flowing again, America made a deal to supply economic aid, modern weapons, and military training.  In return, Saudi Arabia would demand that oil be sold in dollars alone, giving the US an enormous economic advantage, and those dollars were deposited in American banks.

            Although Saudi Arabian oil wealth continued to grow, it was unevenly distributed within the country.  Currently, the Royal family is estimated to contain 15,000 people, with a total net worth of over $1 trillion, ruling a country of 32 million people with a per capita worth of $21K.  Popular discontent at this inequity is controlled within Saudi Arabia by the Wahhabist religious structure, but outrage has exploded into action around the world in the form of terrorism against the western economies, particularly American, that fund this arrangement.  The majority of Islamic terrorist groups in the world are Sunni, inspired and funded by Wahhabism with Saudi oil money.  The five deadliest are all Sunni: Al Qaeda, ISIS, Taliban, Al-Shabaab, and Boko Haram. 

            America's addiction to oil caused us to align ourselves with Saudi Arabia decades ago, and we continue to pay a huge price for that alignment.  With no stake in the Sunni/Shia schism ourselves, we automatically take the Sunni side in the conflict with Iran.  Ignoring Saudi Wahhabist cultivation of terrorists, we vilify Iran as a "terrorist" state.  We recently sold the Saudi's advanced weapons worth $7 billion and Trump is giving them nuclear technology, while sanctioning Iran for its own nuclear development. Our weapons kill children in the Sunni/Shia conflict in Yemen, and even though Congress voted to end involvement in that war, it continues to this day.

            While we are loath to think of America terrorizing parts of the world, we should at least take a look at what our "allies" are doing with our blessing.  Not only do we lose moral standing with the rest of the world, but these attacks kill Americans as well.  Surely there is more to our country than exporting weapons and endless war in exchange for oil, which is changing the climate and killing our children's future.

How America Created "Terrorist" Iran

                                                                                                  written 2 June 2019

                                                                                              published 9 June 2019

                                                                                                

  

            Misuse of antibiotics eliminates moderate and beneficial strains, insuring virulent varieties thrive.  A similar problem occurs in geopolitics.

            For 2500 years the Persian culture has occupied the crossroads between Asia and Europe now known as Iran.  Despite being invaded and occupied by numerous other cultures, it still endures.  Independence was granted by the Allies after WWII, with a constitutional monarchy and an elected parliament.  

            Oil was discovered in 1908, which British Petroleum developed, while keeping the profits.  In 1951 the popular prime minister nationalized the oil fields.  A British supported coup against the prime minister was put down in August 1953, and the Shah went into exile.  One month later, a coup organized by the CIA returned the Shah to power, who handed the oil resources to American oil companies.  

            American foreign policy supports hard line governments in regions of "interest", for American corporate advantage.  The Shah of Iran became our agent in the middle East, building the strongest military in the region.  Aggressive repression of dissent by US trained secret police created a radical religious reaction.  In January 1978, popular demonstrations began, the Shah fled the country, and Iran became an Islamic Republic in April 1979.

            Iran demanded $2B deposited in American banks be returned, which the banks didn't have on hand.  The US government helped by admitting the Shah into the country for cancer treatment in October 1979, expecting a reaction from Iran.  One week later students overran the US embassy in Tehran, taking 52 Americans hostage and the US froze Iranian bank accounts and other assets.  In a cynical piece of geopolitics, the Reagan election committee made a deal with Iran. In exchange for arms, Iran agreed to stall negotiations for the release of the hostages for 444 days, until after the 1980 presidential election, which helped Reagan defeat Carter.

            The same year, taking advantage of Iranian turmoil, Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein launched a surprise invasion.  To punish Iran for deposing our pet middle East dictator, the US backed Hussein, making him our new agent in the region.  After eight years, the war ended with borders back where they started.  One million Iranian had died, many from chemical weapons supplied by the US, further cementing Iranian hatred for America.  

            When Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait in 1990, America pulled together a coalition which defeated Iraq in such short order it disturbed other nations in the region.  

To protect itself from America's thirst for violent regime change, Iran began to expand their nuclear program with Russian help, which increased further after the second Iraqi invasion in 2003.  America responded with crippling economic sanctions.

            By 2007, Israel wanted to attack Iranian nuclear facilities, but American strategists were concerned this would bring the US into the conflict while we were still bogged down in Iraq and Afghanistan. President Bush knew there was little public support for another war.  Working with Israel, the US secretly attacked the Iranian nuclear enrichment facilities with a sophisticated computer virus.  This plan delayed the Iranian program for a year, but was bungled.  The virus spread worldwide and became public, making a sophisticated weapon available to everyone including the Iranians.  A cyber weapons attack on infrastructure was unprecedented, and by doing it first, America normalized such behavior.

            In late 2013, Iran signed a deal with nuclear powers China, Russia, England, and the US, putting a verifiable cap on their enrichment program in exchange for removing economic sanctions.  In 2018, to spite Obama and bolster his own ego, Trump unilaterally welched on the deal, ignoring reports from other countries that Iran was complying.  Trump re-imposed harsh sanctions on Iran, threatening the world if they didn't follow his lead.  We haven't resolved our last middle East war yet, but National Security Advisor Bolton has ratcheted up tension in the Persian Gulf, ignoring the fact that disruption of oil shipments could crash the US economy. 

            Like presidents before him, Trump thinks American is supposed to be the only meddling bully on the planet, and resents competition or defiance.  In addition, he knows that a foreign war is a good distraction from his growing domestic problems.  Iran has suffered American aggression and domination for 70 years, but we call them "terrorists".

The Power Is Going Out

                                                                                                  written 26 May 2019

                                                                                                published 2 June 2019

                                                    

            At the request of citizens, the County voted to form a Climate Advisory Committee.  While I agree that another $100,000 director is a questionable first priority, I was disappointed to see the local cynics pile on to kill the messenger. Denigrating people for concern about climate change is arrogant foolishness masquerading as cleverness. Fortunately, reality has given us a real issue to consider: PG&E plans to shut down the gird this summer to prevent wildfires.

            For decades, PG&E has deferred infrastructure maintenance to boost executive salaries and shareholder returns.  The last two fire seasons have demonstrated the bankruptcy of this plan.  To avoid incurring further liabilities, PG&E has instituted a plan for preemptive grid shutdown whenever there is a red flag weather advisory.  This strategy has been used successfully for several years by Southern California Edison, in conjunction with investments to measure weather conditions, model fire behavior, and reorganize the grid to make a strategic shutdown with minimal disruption.  Coming late to the game, PG&E has made none of these investments, so our grid shutdown will be less graceful.

            With few exceptions, the electricity used in Mendocino County is shipped over long distance transmission lines owned by PG&E. Fire Chief Jennings reported at the recent FireSafe council meeting that PG&E estimated these lines could be shut down as many as 20 times during the fire season.  The company plans to give notice 24 hours beforehand.  A shutdown could be for as little as 12 hours, but could last a few days.  Regulations require that a transmission line be visually inspected before being re-energized to avoid starting a fire with damaged equipment.  

            We count on having electricity 24/7 in our homes and workplaces for cooking, lighting, refrigeration, air conditioning, communication, entertainment, water delivery and sewage disposal.  The new normal will be intermittent electricity, just like a third world country.  Because of the short notice, we are unprepared and this summer could be rough, like an unexpected camping trip.  As individuals, and as a community, we should begin planning now. 

            PG&E has a web page with some suggestions: https://prepareforpowerdown.com.   The following information and suggestions were presented to the FireSafe groups. PG&E shutdown notice will be by NIXLE alert (cell phones) and Sheriff MendoAlert (emails & cells).  When you receive a notice, charge your cell phones, and fill your cars with gas.  If you have garage door openers, park cars outside the garage.  Most gas stations and food stores don't have backup power, and the few that do will have limited supplies.  Consider what makes sense to purchase in advance.  Have cash on hand as the banking system may not function during the shutdown.  When the grid goes down, cell towers may go down as well, so a transistor radio with batteries, or a crank powered radio, is a good option.  Consider solar-powered or crank-powered lights, and flashlights with extra batteries.  People on oxygen should have an extra cylinder on hand.  People with other health needs must consider their alternatives and prepare.  Business owners should decide what functions can still be provided, if any.

            The City of Ukiah is working to set up cooling stations, as a shutdown may happen during high daytime temperatures.  If there is enough water behind the dam, the hydroelectric plant at Lake Mendocino can power the Ukiah High School as a cooling station, with kitchen, cafeteria, and gymnasium space.  The Ukiah hospital will retain electricity with their own backup generator, but will not be a cooling center, and they may be overwhelmed by the emergency.  The City of Ukiah has said that the water and sewage systems will still function for most of those on city services, but anyone outside the city should consider how to provide those services for themselves.

            This is a climate driven emergency.  Decades of corporate denial of the magnitude of the climate crisis have squandered the opportunity for easy solutions, so the situation is now disruptive.  The choice has never been between the economy and the environment: there is no economy without a healthy environment. We will probably survive this fire season, but we must begin to envision and build a resilient community.  The time for complacent denial is over.

Escaping The Black Hole Of Debt

                                                                                                  written 19 May 2019

                                                                                              published 26 May 2019

                                                                                                

            When a debt is created, it is treated as a real asset until it is paid off, without regard to fiscal integrity underlying its creation. A loan to pay for an expensive vacation is treated the same as a loan funding a hostile corporate buyout or loan to build a productive business.  Once in the economic pool, debt is immortal and homogeneous.

            Money is a place holder for value, with no actual use of its own.  When money was tied to actual assets, like a bushel of wheat or an ounce of gold, the expansion of money was somewhat limited, and reflected value in the economy. For the last fifty years, money has been created out of thin air, decoupled from the tangible world.  The value of this fiat money is defined by the creating agency.  As long as everyone has confidence in the creating agency, the economy functions and the debt endures.  The crash of 2008 showed there are limits to this confidence game.

            The American government has a national debt greater than $20 trillion, about equal to the annual gross domestic product of the US economy.  There is an additional $120 trillion in unfunded liability, in the form of Social Security, Medicare, and government pensions, which are contractual future obligations currently without the funds to support them.  The problem is even greater when the costs of deferred infrastructure maintenance and environmental restoration are added.

            The tradition economic solution is to grow the economy.  Even if it was possible on this finite planet, our economic model funds expansion by increasing debt, which grows faster than the actual economy.  Every economic sector is struggling to service their current debt load.  Pensions are underfunded, student debt debilitates an entire generation, retail sales are down, store closings are increasing, wages have been stagnant for fifty years, and income inequity is increasing, so supporting more debt isn't possible.  The classic alternatives at this point are hyperinflation, or total economic collapse.

            Beginning 4000 years ago, debts have been forgiven as regular debt jubilees or in times of financial crisis.  Today no banker wants to admit the debt they carry as asset is really junk, so writing off debt is avoided.  At the peak of the 2008 crash, when it was obvious that banks had worthless balance sheets, they still resisted Federal bailouts which required them to write off their bad loans.  In Europe, the banks dealing with Greece extracted ruinous pension cuts and privatization of public assets before they would consider writing off uncollectable debts. The fiction of debt value is hard to transcend, because it brings into question the judgement of the person or institution that loaned the money in the first place.  

            Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) is an emerging economic model which suggests that fiat money can be used to advantage.  During the 2008 crash, the central banks created $20 trillion in "funny money" to buy up bad debts from the banking industry.  This eventually ended the panic and avoided a collapse of the western economies.  MMT suggests using the same kind of "funny money" to eliminate debts for the larger population.

            Specifically, the government could issue vouchers to provide debt relief for mortgages, student loans, and credit cards, as well as funding a Universal Basic Income (UBI).  For instance, the Treasury could send a voucher to each person with a mortgage, to be mailed to their mortgage lender, cutting the principle balance by 50%, tax free.  The same kind of voucher could be sent to everyone with a student loan or a credit card, cutting their balance by 50%, all paid by the Treasury.  This same source would fund a UBI for everyone with a Social Security number, dealing with the twin employment challenges of outsourcing and automation.  

            This might seem like foolish inflationary pie in the sky, but the current model is headed to hyperinflation or collapse, with increasing economic inequity, creating endless war and environmental devastation, without little benefit to the larger population.  The MMT investment model would do for the 90% what the bank bailout did for the corporations and the 1%, giving a real boost to the real economy, unlike the Trump tax cut.

    

Current Climate Impact

                                                                                                  written 12 May 2019

                                                                                              published 19 May 2019

                                                                                                

            President Trump believes that man-made climate change is a fake news hoax.  However, the Pentagon has long identified climate change as a "threat magnifier," aggravating existing political fault lines and contributing to social upheaval and violent conflict, disrupting whole regions.  Climate change destroys global agricultural production, increasing economic losses, farm failures, food scarcity, and migration pressures.

            Syria experienced drought from 2006-2011, the worst in 900 years, killing 250,000 people.  75% of the farms failed, 85% of the livestock died, and millions moved to the cities. Food scarcity and extreme unemployment helped fuel the Syrian civil war, causing refugees to flood into Europe. Reaction to this influx fed support for fascist political parties, and helped tip the balance in the Brexit vote. The stalled British secession threatens to destabilize the economy of the entire European Union.

            For the benefit of our corporations, America has long supported corrupt and violent governments in Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador, creating a large, poor, malnourished population of subsistence farmers, now threatened by increased climate variability.  In the last decade, hurricanes with heavier rainfalls have destroyed 40 years of public infrastructure.  When half a year's precipitation might fall in a week, and temperatures can surge unexpectedly, harvests have been cut by half.  With no alternative, people migrate north to stay alive, fueling Trump's rabid xenophobic fears.  

            Cyclone Idai hit the eastern coast of Africa on March 2019, the second deadliest on record, affecting over 3 million people in Mozambique, Malawi, and Zimbabwe, killing over 1000.  The storm destroyed 110,000 homes and 3,000 square miles of farmland, only weeks before harvest, requiring $2B to recover.  Five weeks later Cyclone Kenneth made landfall further to the north of Idai, dropping an additional 13" of rain in 24 hours, and displaced 700,000 more people.  The continued rain and flooding have prevented arrival of aid, and hindered replanting in this critical agricultural area, wiping out the main food source for half the population of a very poor area.  

            America is affected as well, with climate related losses of $350B in 2018, not counting the ongoing reduction in food productivity which can last for years.  In October 2018, just before harvest time, Hurricane Michael came ashore as a category 4, affecting the Florida panhandle and southwest Georgia.  It laid waste to cotton fields, pecan orchards, and pine forests, causing $1.7B in damages.  It can take years for a cotton farmer to get out of debt from one lost crop, 8 years for a replanted pecan orchard to begin producing again, and 30 years for a pine forest to mature.  This was the second hurricane to hit this area in 2 years, and tornados are more frequent, all delivering greater amounts of rainfall.

            In March 2019, a strong "bomb cyclone", a storm where intensity increases rapidly over 24 hours, hit the upper American Midwest. The warmer atmosphere holds more water vapor, a 50% increase from 30 years ago, creating heavy precipitation events. The increased rainfall, combined with snow melt, created the worst flooding in decades, affecting 9 million people.  1.1 million acres of cropland were flooded, causing $3B damages.  Trump's trade war has devastated commodity sales, so large quantities of grain, corn, and soybeans were in storage, which were ruined by the flooding and uninsured.  It could be 9 months before agriculture production is fully restored.  Farm incomes are down, expenses are up, and bankruptcies have already increased 19% in 2019.

            Climate extremes produce not only flash floods, but recently identified flash droughts.  A normal drought evolves over years, but a flash drought can form in a matter of months. Record high temperatures, combined with low and rapidly decreasing soil moisture, destroys agriculture and increases fire risk.  A flash drought over 2 months in 2012 caused $30B in agricultural losses in the central US. Another event in 2016 cost $3B. 

            Climate change is already here.  Oil companies identified the problem decades ago but chose to hide the information, so the easy solutions are long gone.  This global problem requires a global solution.  The longer the deniers are in control, the harder the task becomes.  But if we have compassion for our grandchildren, we must rise to the occasion, even if it seems overwhelming.

Let's Talk About Guns

                                                                                                  written 5 May 2019

                                                                                             published12 May 2019

                                                                                                

            Six weeks ago, a white supremacist shot up a mosque in Christchurch, New Zealand.  A 19 year old white man in Poway, California, inspired by the Christchurch event, and influenced by hate sites on social media, decided to kill some Jews.  Two weeks ago, after easily acquiring an assault style rifle, he posted his hate manifesto, entered a synagogue and began shooting.  This was the 97th mass shooting in America in 2019: another lethal example of alienation, amplified by toxic social media, enabled by easy access to powerful weapons.

            My exposure to guns is limited.  Forty-five years ago, I walked into the Ace hardware in Fort Bragg, bought a .22 rifle and a box of cartridges and went out for target practice. A gun is a tool for extending one's will, and with any tool, practice improves skill and accuracy.  I appreciate a good tool, and enjoyed improving my skill, but noticed that after expending the entire box of shells, everything that moved looked like a tempting target.  

            I decided I didn't need that kind of tool in my life, and gave the rifle to my brother-in-law.  He is a hunter, proud that he cooks and eats what he shoots, and he enjoys feeding others. Another brother-in-law collects guns, and used to hunt.  He has accidently discharged a round from an "unloaded gun" at least twice. One of my nephews was recently shot to death, probably with his own pistol, although ballistics and gunpowder residue were not verified.  His girlfriend is now incarcerated.  A gun in the house increases the odds of gun violence, and gun suicides outnumber gun homicides.

            In 1871, the National Rifle Association (NRA) was chartered in New York as a nonprofit organization to advance marksmanship, firearm safety and competency.  The National Firearms Act of 1934, the first federal gun control legislation, was supported by the NRA, whose president Frederick testified "I don't believe in general promiscuous toting of guns.  I think it should be sharply restricted and only under licenses." During the 1970's, the NRA shifted from nonpartisan and aligned with the Republican Party.  After a contentious leadership change in 1977, it began lobbying heavily against gun restrictions, with generous funding from arms manufacturers.

            The NRA has recently suffered setbacks.  Growing public reaction to mass shootings has put the NRA on the defensive, losing support from several sporting goods chains and banks. Their political lobbying activities, prohibited by their nonprofit status, are now being investigated by New York State, which could disband the organization.  Last month, Maria Butina was sentenced to prison as an unregistered Russian agent, active in infiltrating the NRA to advance Russian interests. Butina's boss is suspected of illegally funneling money through the NRA to support the Trump campaign.  The NRA leadership is in open conflict over their advertising agency, including questionable payments, conflicts of interest, and promoting policies unrelated to NRA original values.

            The NRA argues that unfettered gun ownership is part of the second amendment of the Constitution, which reads "... the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed," but in 1776, "arms" were a handmade, muzzle loaded, black powder flintlock pistol or musket.  Perhaps ownership of those arms should be unfettered, but our population density is 33 times greater, and powerful modern weapons must be regulated.  Polls within the last year show that 2/3 of Americans support stricter gun laws, including background checks and mandatory waiting periods.

            Modern weapons could be treated like automobiles, another powerful, dangerous tool.  Most people have a right to own and operate a car, even multiple cars, but they are required to register them, take regular tests to prove they are safe operators, and have liability insurance to protect the larger public.  Failure to comply with these regulations mean loss of rights. In addition, guns might be required to have clear indicators of being loaded, have digital fingerprint trigger locks, and have every part etched with the gun serial number.  Ammunition might also have identification numbers on slugs and casings. 

            NRA president Frederick had it right in 1934. Promiscuous gun toting should be sharply restricted to preserve the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for the general society.

A Fresh Perspective

                                                                                                  written 28 April 2019

                                                                                                 published 5 May 2019

                                                 

            Individuals, and cultures, operate within a story that frames perspective and shapes responses.  Changing the story, or perspective, changes the response. Picture a backyard where high fences block the view, and imagine rising up in a balloon.  The limitation of the fences fall away by adding a new dimension of awareness.  The Presencing Institute, investigating the "intersection of science, consciousness, and social change" at MIT's Sloan School of Management, recently released a paper called "Axial Shift", describing an additional perspective for examining the political, economic, and educational issues of the 21st century. The following is excerpted from that paper.

            The traditional 20th century political division of left versus right is expanded with an orthogonal axis of open versus closed. We are familiar with the closed model, now dominant in countries such as America and Brazil (although election of Trump and Bolsonaro are symptoms of the closed problem, not the cause).  "The closed model amplifies Fear (closed will), Hate (closed heart), and Ignorance (closed mind) through five behaviors: blinding (not seeing reality); de-sensing (not empathizing with others); absencing (losing the connection to one’s highest future); blaming others (an inability to reflect); and destroying (destruction of nature, relationships, and self)".

            One example is mass shootings: "not looking at the real issues, such as gun laws (blinding); not empathizing with the real victims (de-sensing); claiming that the student activists are paid actors (absencing); blaming the victims for not defending themselves (blaming others); and putting the community on a path toward civil war (self-destruction)".

            Another example is climate change: "not accepting scientific evidence (blinding); not empathizing with the increasing number of victims, particularly in the global South (de-sensing); dismantling the Environmental Protection Agency (absencing); actively undermining the credibility of climate science and climate scientists (blaming others); and pulling out of the Paris Agreement (putting civilization on a path toward self-destruction)".

            The lesser practiced open model amplifies Courage (open will), Compassion (open heart), and Curiosity (open mind) with five complementary behaviors: seeing,sensing, presencing (capacity to connect with deep sources within), crystallizing (group commitment), and co-creating.

            "Open versus closed is not new.  What’s new today are three conditions: that the issue is now playing out globally; that we have only one decade left to transform our economies and societies in line with the planetary boundaries for sustainable development; and that social media are amplifying the toxic behaviors (i.e., the cycle of absencing) on levels not seen before".

            Economic discussion traditionally focuses on growth, with debate between government intervention on one side and free market private processes on the other. But mushrooming debt limits government intervention and the 2008 crash showed limitations of the market process. The deeper question is "growth of what?"  The convenience of financial quantification made growth of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) easy to monitor.

But GDP measures output, not outcome, and social well-being is not the same as more goods and services.  Rising health care costs increases GDP, but reflects increased social misery, and increasing consumption on a finite planet is suicidal.  

            An alternative to the material growth paradigm is a focus on well-being for all. Some examples are Bhutan’s Gross National Happiness indicator or the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (no poverty, zero hunger, good health, quality education, gender equality, clean water and sanitation, affordable clean energy, decent work, innovative industry, reduced inequality, sustainable cities, responsible consumption, climate action, and peace).

            The old left/right discourse in education debated public versus private schools .  "The new discourse focuses on the type of learning: memorizing facts vs. whole child approaches to learning that integrates head, heart, hand.  The Montessori school system is a good example, as is the Finnish education system. Automation and the artificial intelligence revolution are already reshaping society, replacing jobs based on skills learned by memorizing figures, formulas, and facts, challenging humanity to cultivate human compassion, empathic human services, collective creativity, deep listening, generative dialogue, and collective presence."

            "The difference is not ideology, it is consciousness, the quality of how we connect: shifting from ego-system awareness to eco-system awareness, from me to we.  The Presencing Institute is an effort to transform our old civilizational structures through bridging the ecological, social, and spiritual divides."  To read the whole article, go to https://www.presencing.org/transforming-capitalism-lab/stories/axial-shift.